0.00/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.29	% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
0.09/0.29	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.29	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.29	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPULimit   : 960
0.09/0.29	% WCLimit    : 120
0.09/0.29	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:29:41 EDT 2022
0.09/0.29	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.39	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.14/0.39	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.14/0.39	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting sh4l with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# post_as_ho5 with pid 15366 completed with status 0
0.14/0.40	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.14/0.40	# ...ProofStateSinE()=2/3
0.14/0.40	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSFFMMBN
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 65s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 15369 completed with status 0
0.14/0.40	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 120s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.14/0.40	# ...ProofStateSinE()=2/3
0.14/0.40	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSFFMMBN
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 65s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.14/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# Proof found!
0.14/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_22, type, leibeq: $o > $o > $o).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: $o).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_0: $o).
0.14/0.40	thf(leibeq1, axiom, ((leibeq)=(^[X1:$o, X2:$o]:(![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ ((X1)))=>(X3 @ ((X2)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', leibeq1)).
0.14/0.40	thf(conj, conjecture, ![X4:$o, X5:$o]:(((leibeq @ ((X4)) @ ((X5)))=>((X4)<=>(X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj)).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_2, plain, ((leibeq)=(^[Z0:$o, Z1:$o]:(![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ ((Z0)))=>(X3 @ ((Z1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[leibeq1])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X4:$o, X5:$o]:((![X8:$o > $o]:(((X8 @ ((X4)))=>(X8 @ ((X5)))))=>((X4)<=>(X5))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]), c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X11:$o > $o]:(((((~(epred2_0)|(X11 @ $true)|(~(epred1_0)|~(X11 @ $true)))&((epred2_0)|(X11 @ $false)|(~(epred1_0)|~(X11 @ $true))))&((~(epred2_0)|(X11 @ $true)|((epred1_0)|~(X11 @ $false)))&((epred2_0)|(X11 @ $false)|((epred1_0)|~(X11 @ $false)))))&((~(epred1_0)|~(epred2_0))&((epred1_0)|(epred2_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((epred2_0)|(X3 @ (~($true)))|~((epred1_0))|~((X3 @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0)|(epred2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ (~($true)))|(epred2_0)|~((X3 @ (($true)))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ (($true)))|(epred1_0)|~((epred2_0))|~((X3 @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0))|~((epred2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_7])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ (($true)))|(epred1_0)|~((X3 @ (~($true)))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_6])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((X3 @ (($true)))|~((X3 @ (~($true)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 3
0.14/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.14/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 6
0.14/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.14/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.14/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 11
0.14/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.14/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.14/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 10
0.14/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.14/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.14/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 5
0.14/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.14/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.14/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.14/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.14/0.40	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.14/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.14/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.14/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.14/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.14/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.14/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.14/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
0.14/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.14/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
0.14/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.14/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.14/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.14/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 12
0.14/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 521
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.40	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.14/0.40	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.14/0.40	# Total time               : 0.003 s
0.14/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.40	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.14/0.40	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.14/0.40	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.14/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.14/0.40	EOF